Metro Life Score

Durham-Chapel Hill, NC

Below-median composite Life Score — grade B-, 44th percentile of the national corpus.

48.2
Life Score / 100
B-
Grade (curved)
#216
of 387 metros
44%
composite percentile
View your shortlist

Data updated August 2026

The verdict

Durham-Chapel Hill is below-median composite Life Score — #216 of 387 (48.2/100, grade B-, 44th percentile). Carried by wages at 80/100; held back most by rent at 20/100.

44th
composite percentile
#216
of 387 peers
30th
cost dimension percentile
80th
wages dimension percentile

Life Score shape · MID · WAGE-LED · signature wages

Durham-Chapel Hill: pay power is the signature

Durham-Chapel Hill stamps MID · WAGE-LED with wages at the 80th percentile of the metro corpus (HIGH) — ahead of its cost mark (DEAR, 30th) and composite #216. Wages (80/100) amplifies the lead; Rent (20/100) is the residual gap. According to PlainCompare's federal Life Score corpus ranking, Durham-Chapel Hill, NC ranks #216 of 387 metros by composite Life Score (highest = #1) and #269 of 387 by cost-of-living dimension score (highest = #1). Methodology.

BEA RPP 97.6 (rent-RPP 98.9). BLS median salary $71,457, 295,700 jobs (Software Developers, Retail Salespersons, Medical Secretaries and Administrative Assistants). HUD 2BR FMR $1,711/mo (studio $1,417).

FBI UCR (NC): 365 violent, 1930 property/100K. NCES: 16.1:1 ratio, 7.6% charter. DOL infant childcare $9,487/yr. EPA: 42 Superfund sites (NC).

Where Durham-Chapel Hill sits among all US metros

Composite Life Score vs the national field

48 44th percentile higher than 44% of 387 US metros

This metro 25 75 every US metro, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US metros. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source PlainCompare composite of BEA, BLS, HUD, FBI, NCES, DOL, EPA data · August 2026

How the 48.2 is built

Durham-Chapel Hill's Life Score, decomposed

Dimension detail

How Durham-Chapel Hill scores, dimension by dimension

Score Breakdown

Cost of Living Wages Rent Safety Schools Childcare Environment

Dimension Scores

Cost of Living 31/100 (20%) Average
Wages 80/100 (20%) Above average
Rent 20/100 (15%) Below average
Safety 48/100 (15%) Average
Schools 55/100 (10%) Average
Childcare 60/100 (10%) Average
Environment 44/100 (10%) Average

Key Data Points

97.6
Cost Index (RPP)
$71,457
Avg Median Salary
$1,711
2BR Fair Market Rent
365
Violent Crime/100K (NC)
16.1:1
Student-Teacher Ratio
$9,487
Infant Childcare/yr (NC)
42
Superfund Sites (NC)
295,700
Total Employment

Geography used: crime, schools, childcare, and environment cards above are NC state-level when metro-specific feeds are unavailable, see the scope key at the top of this page.

Compare Durham-Chapel Hill With...

Ranking Context

Durham-Chapel Hill outranks 44% of U.S. metros.

Rank Metro Score Grade
#213 Charlottesville, VA 48.3 B-
#214 Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA 48.7 B-
#215 Bloomington, IL 48.7 B-
#216 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 48.2 B-
#217 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 48.2 C+
#218 Jacksonville, NC 48.1 C+
#219 Niles, MI 48.1 C+

Quality vs. Affordability

Durham-Chapel Hill, NC's quality rank (bottom 44% lowest-quality) and affordability rank (bottom 31% least affordable) sit close together -- an unusually proportionate metro where overall quality and cost-of-living move together.

Durham-Chapel Hill, NC (highlighted) among its 12 nearest composite-Life-Score peers, out of 387 tracked metros nationally. Crosshairs mark this peer neighborhood's own median composite score and cost-of-living score. Cost-of-living score is already inverted so higher = more affordable. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 12 entities by Composite Life Score (X) and Cost-of-living score (higher = more affordable) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High quality, affordableAffordable, lower qualityHigh quality, pricierLower quality, pricier 47.54848.54949.5 020406080100 Composite Life Score Cost-of-living score (higher = more affordable) Composite Life Score vs. cost-of-living score Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA-49, 20.7Spokane-Spokane Valley, WAMichigan City-La Porte, IN-48.9, 65.3Michigan City-La Porte, INRacine-Mount Pleasant, WI-48.9, 37.8Racine-Mount Pleasant, WIBloomington, IL-48.7, 50Bloomington, ILKingsport-Bristol, TN-VA-48.7, 93Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VACharlottesville, VA-48.3, 24.9Charlottesville, VADurham-Chapel Hill, NC-48.2, 30.6Durham-Chapel Hill, NCLakeland-Winter Haven, FL-48.2, 32.4Lakeland-Winter Haven, FLJacksonville, NC-48.1, 62.2Jacksonville, NCNiles, MI-48.1, 60.6Niles, MIPortland-South Portland, ME-48.1, 14.8Portland-South Portland, MEChambersburg, PA-48, 45.3Chambersburg, PA
Durham-Chapel Hill, NC (highlighted) among its 12 nearest composite-Life-Score peers, out of 387 tracked metros nationally. Crosshairs mark this peer neighborhood's own median composite score and cost-of-living score. Cost-of-living score is already inverted so higher = more affordable.

NC Metro Scores

Read with Durham-Chapel Hill

Nearest composite peers and cost poles for Durham-Chapel Hill (MID · WAGE-LED · DEAR/HIGH), replacing the fixed Explore/Guides strip.

Using Durham-Chapel Hill's middle-third Life Score

Durham-Chapel Hill scores 48.2/100 overall, but Wages (80.1) and Rent (19.9) sit 60.1 points apart, so decide which of the two matters more to you before leaning on the total.

  • Wages is the strongest of Durham-Chapel Hill's seven dimensions (weighted 20% in the composite); if it is your priority, this is where the metro earns its rank. See all seven dimensions
  • Rent is the weakest (weighted 15% in the composite); if it is a dealbreaker, weigh it before the ranking does. Rank metros on the composite
  • Greenville is the nearest comparison this page can offer; put the two side by side on the same seven dimensions. Compare with Greenville

A middle-third composite is a weighted blend; individual dimensions can sit well above or below it.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Durham-Chapel Hill Life Score 48.2/100 · signature wages · retrieved and formatted by PlainCompare