Metro Life Score

Flagstaff, AZ

Bottom-quartile composite Life Score — grade C-, 12th percentile of the national corpus.

40.3
Life Score / 100
C-
Grade (curved)
#340
of 387 metros
12%
composite percentile
View your shortlist

Data updated August 2026

The verdict

Flagstaff is bottom-quartile composite Life Score — #340 of 387 (40.3/100, grade C-, 12th percentile). Carried by environment at 82/100; held back most by rent at 11/100.

12th
composite percentile
#340
of 387 peers
21st
cost dimension percentile
59th
wages dimension percentile

Life Score shape · LOWER · ENVIRO-LED · signature composite

Flagstaff: bottom-third composite — where the drag concentrates

Flagstaff sits in the bottom third of the metro corpus on composite (#340 of 387, 40.3/100, 12th percentile). Stamps LOWER · ENVIRO-LED; Rent at 11/100 is the main drag; Environment (82/100) keeps the floor. Cost/wage marks DEAR/MID. According to PlainCompare's federal Life Score corpus ranking, Flagstaff, AZ ranks #340 of 387 metros by composite Life Score (highest = #1) and #306 of 387 by cost-of-living dimension score (highest = #1). Methodology.

BEA RPP 100.3 (rent-RPP 109.0). BLS median salary $66,006, 58,590 jobs (Fast Food and Counter Workers, Waiters and Waitresses, General and Operations Managers). HUD 2BR FMR $1,921/mo (studio $1,597).

FBI UCR (AZ): 429 violent, 1786 property/100K. NCES: 17.2:1 ratio, 25.9% charter. DOL infant childcare $11,301/yr. EPA: 13 Superfund sites (AZ).

Where Flagstaff sits among all US metros

Composite Life Score vs the national field

40 12th percentile higher than 12% of 387 US metros

This metro 25 75 every US metro, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US metros. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source PlainCompare composite of BEA, BLS, HUD, FBI, NCES, DOL, EPA data · August 2026

How the 40.3 is built

Flagstaff's Life Score, decomposed

Dimension detail

How Flagstaff scores, dimension by dimension

Score Breakdown

Cost of Living Wages Rent Safety Schools Childcare Environment

Dimension Scores

Cost of Living 21/100 (20%) Below average
Wages 60/100 (20%) Average
Rent 11/100 (15%) Below average
Safety 25/100 (15%) Below average
Schools 68/100 (10%) Average
Childcare 39/100 (10%) Average
Environment 82/100 (10%) Above average

Key Data Points

100.3
Cost Index (RPP)
$66,006
Avg Median Salary
$1,921
2BR Fair Market Rent
429
Violent Crime/100K (AZ)
17.2:1
Student-Teacher Ratio
$11,301
Infant Childcare/yr (AZ)
13
Superfund Sites (AZ)
58,590
Total Employment

Geography used: crime, schools, childcare, and environment cards above are AZ state-level when metro-specific feeds are unavailable, see the scope key at the top of this page.

Compare Flagstaff With...

Ranking Context

Flagstaff outranks 12% of U.S. metros.

Rank Metro Score Grade
#337 Anchorage, AK 40.4 C-
#338 Vallejo, CA 40.5 C-
#339 Modesto, CA 40.5 C-
#340 Flagstaff, AZ 40.3 C-
#341 Kankakee, IL 40.3 C-
#342 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 40.1 C-
#343 Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO 40.0 C-

Quality vs. Affordability

Flagstaff, AZ's quality rank (bottom 12% lowest-quality) and affordability rank (bottom 21% least affordable) sit close together -- an unusually proportionate metro where overall quality and cost-of-living move together.

Flagstaff, AZ (highlighted) among its 12 nearest composite-Life-Score peers, out of 387 tracked metros nationally. Crosshairs mark this peer neighborhood's own median composite score and cost-of-living score. Cost-of-living score is already inverted so higher = more affordable. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 12 entities by Composite Life Score (X) and Cost-of-living score (higher = more affordable) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High quality, affordableAffordable, lower qualityHigh quality, pricierLower quality, pricier 39.84040.240.440.640.8 020406080 Composite Life Score Cost-of-living score (higher = more affordable) Composite Life Score vs. cost-of-living score Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT Metropolitan Statistical Area-40.7, 5.2Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaHagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV-40.7, 46.1Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WVHelena, MT-40.7, 39.4Helena, MTModesto, CA-40.5, 8.8Modesto, CAVallejo, CA-40.5, 4.4Vallejo, CAAnchorage, AK-40.4, 7Anchorage, AKFlagstaff, AZ-40.3, 21Flagstaff, AZKankakee, IL-40.3, 36.5Kankakee, ILSan Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA-40.1, 2.3San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CADenver-Aurora-Centennial, CO-40, 6Denver-Aurora-Centennial, COGettysburg, PA-40, 41.2Gettysburg, PAKnoxville, TN-40, 58.8Knoxville, TN
Flagstaff, AZ (highlighted) among its 12 nearest composite-Life-Score peers, out of 387 tracked metros nationally. Crosshairs mark this peer neighborhood's own median composite score and cost-of-living score. Cost-of-living score is already inverted so higher = more affordable.

AZ Metro Scores

Read with Flagstaff

Nearest composite peers and cost poles for Flagstaff (LOWER · ENVIRO-LED · DEAR/MID), replacing the fixed Explore/Guides strip.

Using Flagstaff's bottom-third Life Score

Flagstaff scores 40.3/100 overall, but Environment (81.6) and Rent (10.9) sit 70.7 points apart, so decide which of the two matters more to you before leaning on the total.

  • Environment is the strongest of Flagstaff's seven dimensions (weighted 10% in the composite); if it is your priority, this is where the metro earns its rank. See all seven dimensions
  • Rent is the weakest (weighted 15% in the composite); if it is a dealbreaker, weigh it before the ranking does. Rank metros on the composite
  • Sierra Vista is the nearest comparison this page can offer; put the two side by side on the same seven dimensions. Compare with Sierra Vista

A low composite is a weighted blend; individual dimensions can still be strong.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Flagstaff Life Score 40.3/100 · signature composite · retrieved and formatted by PlainCompare