Metro Life Score

Great Falls, MT

Bottom-quartile composite Life Score — grade D, 4th percentile of the national corpus.

37.3
Life Score / 100
D
Grade (curved)
#371
of 387 metros
4%
composite percentile
View your shortlist

Data updated August 2026

The verdict

Great Falls is bottom-quartile composite Life Score — #371 of 387 (37.3/100, grade D, 4th percentile). Carried by environment at 94/100; held back most by schools at 4/100.

4th
composite percentile
#371
of 387 peers
34th
cost dimension percentile
27th
wages dimension percentile

Life Score shape · BOTTOM · ENVIRO-LED · signature composite

Great Falls: bottom-third composite — where the drag concentrates

Great Falls sits in the bottom third of the metro corpus on composite (#371 of 387, 37.3/100, 4th percentile). Stamps BOTTOM · ENVIRO-LED; Schools at 4/100 is the main drag; Environment (94/100) keeps the floor. Cost/wage marks DEAR/LOW. According to PlainCompare's federal Life Score corpus ranking, Great Falls, MT ranks #371 of 387 metros by composite Life Score (highest = #1) and #256 of 387 by cost-of-living dimension score (highest = #1). Methodology.

BEA RPP 96.8 (rent-RPP 97.1). BLS median salary $60,566, 31,100 jobs (Fast Food and Counter Workers, Retail Salespersons, Home Health and Personal Care Aides). HUD 2BR FMR $1,284/mo (studio $960).

FBI UCR (MT): 426 violent, 1646 property/100K. NCES: 11.3:1 ratio, 0.0% charter. DOL infant childcare $11,466/yr. EPA: 19 Superfund sites (MT).

Where Great Falls sits among all US metros

Composite Life Score vs the national field

37 4th percentile higher than 4% of 387 US metros

This metro 25 75 every US metro, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US metros. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source PlainCompare composite of BEA, BLS, HUD, FBI, NCES, DOL, EPA data · August 2026

How the 37.3 is built

Great Falls's Life Score, decomposed

Dimension detail

How Great Falls scores, dimension by dimension

Score Breakdown

Cost of Living Wages Rent Safety Schools Childcare Environment

Dimension Scores

Cost of Living 34/100 (20%) Average
Wages 27/100 (20%) Average
Rent 52/100 (15%) Average
Safety 26/100 (15%) Average
Schools 4/100 (10%) Bottom 10%
Childcare 36/100 (10%) Average
Environment 94/100 (10%) Top 10%

Key Data Points

96.8
Cost Index (RPP)
$60,566
Avg Median Salary
$1,284
2BR Fair Market Rent
426
Violent Crime/100K (MT)
11.3:1
Student-Teacher Ratio
$11,466
Infant Childcare/yr (MT)
19
Superfund Sites (MT)
31,100
Total Employment

Geography used: crime, schools, childcare, and environment cards above are MT state-level when metro-specific feeds are unavailable, see the scope key at the top of this page.

Compare Great Falls With...

Ranking Context

Great Falls outranks 4% of U.S. metros.

Rank Metro Score Grade
#368 Santa Fe, NM 37.4 D
#369 Ithaca, NY 37.4 D
#370 Dover, DE 37.8 D
#371 Great Falls, MT 37.3 D
#372 Worcester, MA 36.4 D
#373 Lexington Park, MD 36.3 D
#374 Barnstable Town, MA 36.2 D

Quality vs. Affordability

Great Falls, MT is bottom 4% lowest-quality nationally and also bottom 34% least affordable -- a rarer combination among its composite-quality peers, where overall rank and affordability rank usually diverge more than this.

Great Falls, MT (highlighted) among its 12 nearest composite-Life-Score peers, out of 387 tracked metros nationally. Crosshairs mark this peer neighborhood's own median composite score and cost-of-living score. Cost-of-living score is already inverted so higher = more affordable. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 12 entities by Composite Life Score (X) and Cost-of-living score (higher = more affordable) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High quality, affordableAffordable, lower qualityHigh quality, pricierLower quality, pricier 3536373839 010203040 Composite Life Score Cost-of-living score (higher = more affordable) Composite Life Score vs. cost-of-living score Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN-38.2, 36.8Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TNOxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA-38.2, 2.1Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CASalinas, CA-38.2, 3.4Salinas, CADover, DE-37.8, 31.1Dover, DEIthaca, NY-37.4, 10.9Ithaca, NYSanta Fe, NM-37.4, 25.4Santa Fe, NMGreat Falls, MT-37.3, 33.9Great Falls, MTWorcester, MA-36.4, 13Worcester, MALexington Park, MD-36.3, 18.9Lexington Park, MDBarnstable Town, MA-36.2, 26.7Barnstable Town, MAAmherst Town-Northampton, MA-35.9, 21.5Amherst Town-Northampton, MAUrban Honolulu, HI-35.6, 1.8Urban Honolulu, HI
Great Falls, MT (highlighted) among its 12 nearest composite-Life-Score peers, out of 387 tracked metros nationally. Crosshairs mark this peer neighborhood's own median composite score and cost-of-living score. Cost-of-living score is already inverted so higher = more affordable.

MT Metro Scores

Read with Great Falls

Nearest composite peers and cost poles for Great Falls (BOTTOM · ENVIRO-LED · DEAR/LOW), replacing the fixed Explore/Guides strip.

Using Great Falls's bottom-third Life Score

Great Falls scores 37.3/100 overall, but Environment (94.0) and Schools (4.4) sit 89.6 points apart, so decide which of the two matters more to you before leaning on the total.

  • Environment is the strongest of Great Falls's seven dimensions (weighted 10% in the composite); if it is your priority, this is where the metro earns its rank. See all seven dimensions
  • Schools is the weakest (weighted 10% in the composite); if it is a dealbreaker, weigh it before the ranking does. Rank metros on the composite
  • Billings is the nearest comparison this page can offer; put the two side by side on the same seven dimensions. Compare with Billings

A low composite is a weighted blend; individual dimensions can still be strong.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Great Falls Life Score 37.3/100 · signature composite · retrieved and formatted by PlainCompare