Metro Life Score

Tuscaloosa, AL

Above-median composite Life Score — grade B+, 73rd percentile of the national corpus.

55.5
Life Score / 100
B+
Grade (curved)
#104
of 387 metros
73%
composite percentile
View your shortlist

Data updated August 2026

The verdict

Tuscaloosa is above-median composite Life Score — #104 of 387 (55.5/100, grade B+, 73rd percentile). Carried by childcare at 90/100; held back most by environment at 3/100.

73rd
composite percentile
#104
of 387 peers
88th
cost dimension percentile
14th
wages dimension percentile

Life Score shape · UPPER · BALANCED · signature cost

Tuscaloosa: affordability leads the Life Score story

Tuscaloosa is a UPPER-band metro whose cost dimension sits at the 88th percentile of 387 US metros (FLOOR) while composite is #104 (55.5/100, grade B+). Childcare at 90/100 carries the upside; Environment at 3/100 is the residual drag. According to PlainCompare's federal Life Score corpus ranking, Tuscaloosa, AL ranks #104 of 387 metros by composite Life Score (highest = #1) and #47 of 387 by cost-of-living dimension score (highest = #1). Methodology.

BEA RPP 87.7 (rent-RPP 58.2). BLS median salary $58,026, 96,660 jobs (Miscellaneous Assemblers and Fabricators, Retail Salespersons, Cashiers). HUD 2BR FMR $1,140/mo (studio $863).

FBI UCR (AL): 376 violent, 1622 property/100K. NCES: 17.2:1 ratio, 1.2% charter. DOL infant childcare $6,896/yr. EPA: 16 Superfund sites (AL).

Where Tuscaloosa sits among all US metros

Composite Life Score vs the national field

56 73rd percentile higher than 73% of 387 US metros

This metro 25 75 every US metro, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US metros. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source PlainCompare composite of BEA, BLS, HUD, FBI, NCES, DOL, EPA data · August 2026

How the 55.5 is built

Tuscaloosa's Life Score, decomposed

Dimension detail

How Tuscaloosa scores, dimension by dimension

Score Breakdown

Cost of Living Wages Rent Safety Schools Childcare Environment

Dimension Scores

Cost of Living 88/100 (20%) Above average
Wages 15/100 (20%) Below average
Rent 75/100 (15%) Average
Safety 42/100 (15%) Average
Schools 83/100 (10%) Above average
Childcare 90/100 (10%) Top 10%
Environment 3/100 (10%) Bottom 10%

Key Data Points

87.7
Cost Index (RPP)
$58,026
Avg Median Salary
$1,140
2BR Fair Market Rent
376
Violent Crime/100K (AL)
17.2:1
Student-Teacher Ratio
$6,896
Infant Childcare/yr (AL)
16
Superfund Sites (AL)
96,660
Total Employment

Geography used: crime, schools, childcare, and environment cards above are AL state-level when metro-specific feeds are unavailable, see the scope key at the top of this page.

Compare Tuscaloosa With...

Ranking Context

Tuscaloosa outranks 73% of U.S. metros.

Rank Metro Score Grade
#101 Wichita, KS 55.6 B+
#102 Lima, OH 55.6 B+
#103 Muncie, IN 55.7 B+
#104 Tuscaloosa, AL 55.5 B+
#105 Battle Creek, MI 55.5 B+
#106 Canton-Massillon, OH 55.5 B+
#107 Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH 55.5 B+

Quality vs. Affordability

Tuscaloosa, AL's quality rank (top 27% highest-quality) and affordability rank (top 12% most affordable) sit close together -- an unusually proportionate metro where overall quality and cost-of-living move together.

Tuscaloosa, AL (highlighted) among its 12 nearest composite-Life-Score peers, out of 387 tracked metros nationally. Crosshairs mark this peer neighborhood's own median composite score and cost-of-living score. Cost-of-living score is already inverted so higher = more affordable. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 12 entities by Composite Life Score (X) and Cost-of-living score (higher = more affordable) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. High quality, affordableAffordable, lower qualityHigh quality, pricierLower quality, pricier 5555.255.455.655.8 405060708090100 Composite Life Score Cost-of-living score (higher = more affordable) Composite Life Score vs. cost-of-living score Muncie, IN-55.7, 85.8Muncie, INLima, OH-55.6, 76.2Lima, OHWichita, KS-55.6, 80.8Wichita, KSBattle Creek, MI-55.5, 72Battle Creek, MICanton-Massillon, OH-55.5, 77.7Canton-Massillon, OHDayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH-55.5, 57.3Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OHTuscaloosa, AL-55.5, 88.1Tuscaloosa, ALLa Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN-55.4, 64.5La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MNRome, GA-55.4, 74.4Rome, GALaredo, TX-55.2, 91.7Laredo, TXManhattan, KS-55.2, 74.1Manhattan, KSRoanoke, VA-55.2, 49.5Roanoke, VA
Tuscaloosa, AL (highlighted) among its 12 nearest composite-Life-Score peers, out of 387 tracked metros nationally. Crosshairs mark this peer neighborhood's own median composite score and cost-of-living score. Cost-of-living score is already inverted so higher = more affordable.

AL Metro Scores

Read with Tuscaloosa

Nearest composite peers and cost poles for Tuscaloosa (UPPER · BALANCED · FLOOR/LOW), replacing the fixed Explore/Guides strip.

Using Tuscaloosa's top-third Life Score

Tuscaloosa scores 55.5/100 overall, but Childcare (90.0) and Environment (2.8) sit 87.2 points apart, so decide which of the two matters more to you before leaning on the total.

  • Childcare is the strongest of Tuscaloosa's seven dimensions (weighted 10% in the composite); if it is your priority, this is where the metro earns its rank. See all seven dimensions
  • Environment is the weakest (weighted 10% in the composite); if it is a dealbreaker, weigh it before the ranking does. Rank metros on the composite
  • Decatur is the nearest comparison this page can offer; put the two side by side on the same seven dimensions. Compare with Decatur

A high composite is a weighted blend; it does not mean every dimension is strong.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Tuscaloosa Life Score 55.5/100 · signature cost · retrieved and formatted by PlainCompare