Guide

What Metro-Level Data Tells You

By the numbers

The seven dimensions, by the numbers

7
dimensions of daily life
6
federal source agencies
387
US metros scored
51
states scored
Cost of Living20%Wages20%Rent15%Safety15%Schools10%Childcare10%Environment10%
How the composite Life Score is weighted, cost of living and wages carry the most, each from its own federal dataset.

Understanding what each data dimension reveals, and where the numbers have limits.

Key Takeaway

Metro areas are defined by commuting patterns, not political boundaries, they capture the real economic geography. Cost of living (especially housing) is the most variable dimension, with housing costs differing 4x+ between cheap and expensive metros. Each data source measures something different: wages don't account for cost of living, crime rates don't account for reporting differences, and health data reflects communities, not individuals.

Affordability: Cost of Living vs. Income

Raw salary comparisons are meaningless without cost of living context. A $80,000 salary in Topeka, Kansas (RPP ~87) buys significantly more than $100,000 in Boston (RPP ~115). PlainCompare shows both wages and Regional Price Parities so you can calculate real purchasing power.

The formula: Real income = Nominal income ÷ (RPP / 100). An $80,000 salary at RPP 87 equals $91,954 in national-average purchasing power. A $100,000 salary at RPP 115 equals $86,957. The Topeka worker is financially better off despite a lower nominal salary.

Browse metro rankings by affordability to see which areas offer the best value.

Safety: Violent and Property Crime

PlainCompare shows FBI crime data broken into violent crime (direct threat to personal safety) and property crime (theft, burglary, financial loss without direct physical threat). These measure very different risks:

  • A metro with low violent crime but high property crime is generally safe to walk around but has a car theft or package theft problem.
  • A metro with high violent crime but low property crime may have concentrated violence in specific neighborhoods while most areas are safe.

Metro-level crime averages can mask neighborhood variation. Use PlainCompare for initial screening, then research specific neighborhoods within your target metros.

Jobs, Education, Health, and Environment

Jobs: BLS data shows employment levels and wages by occupation. Check whether your specific field is well-represented and well-paid in the metro, aggregate income numbers aren't useful if your industry is absent.

Education: NCES and Census data show school infrastructure and adult educational attainment. High bachelor's degree rates (40%+) correlate with stronger school systems, more professional services, and higher property values.

Health: CDC community health indicators reveal population-level health behaviors and outcomes. These affect your healthcare environment, insurance costs, provider availability, and the health culture of your community.

Environment: EPA air quality data and NOAA climate normals show the physical environment. Air quality affects long-term health, and climate affects daily comfort and energy costs. Check metro pages for the full breakdown.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Regional Price Parity (RPP)?

An RPP is the BEA's measure of how much goods and services cost in a metro relative to the national average (100). An RPP of 110 means prices are 10% above national average. An RPP of 90 means 10% below. RPPs cover all consumer goods and services, with separate measures for housing, which varies most dramatically.

Why is housing the biggest price differentiator?

Housing RPPs range from 60 (40% below average) to over 200 (double the average). No other expense category varies this much. A median home in San Jose costs 4x what it costs in Memphis. This is why housing affordability is typically the dominant factor in cost-of-living comparisons.

What crime data does PlainCompare show?

FBI UCR data covering violent crime (murder, assault, robbery, sexual assault) and property crime (burglary, theft, vehicle theft) rates per 100,000 residents. Rates are more meaningful than counts because they normalize for population size. Some metros don't report to the FBI program, PlainCompare notes where data is unavailable.

How should I interpret healthcare-access data for a metro?

HRSA Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) designations show where a metro is short on primary care, dental, or mental health providers relative to its population. A high shortage score means longer waits and fewer options for care, it is a measure of provider availability, not the health status of residents.

What does the composite score mean?

PlainCompare's composite score combines multiple data dimensions into a single livability index. It weights affordability, safety, health, education, and environment into a normalized 0-100 scale. The score provides a quick comparison but should not replace dimension-by-dimension analysis, a high composite score can mask weakness in one area you care about deeply.

Can I trust FBI crime data?

FBI UCR data is the best available national crime dataset, but it has limitations. Not all agencies report in every year. Reporting practices differ between jurisdictions, some agencies are more aggressive about recording crimes than others. Comparing year-over-year trends within a single metro is more reliable than comparing absolute rates between different metros.

Sources

  • Bureau of Economic Analysis, FBI UCR, BLS OEWS, Census ACS, NCES, HRSA HPSA, EPA AQS

This content is for informational purposes only. Data represents statistical averages for metropolitan areas and may not reflect conditions in specific neighborhoods.

A worked example

Take the same $100,000 salary to two different metros. In one with a cost-of-living index of 95, below the national average of 100, that salary stretches further than in a metro at 115, a gap of roughly $20,000 in real purchasing power before you weigh rent, schools, safety or commute. Affordability is just one of the seven dimensions, but it is the one that reshapes every other trade-off, which is why a side-by-side comparison beats any single headline number.

Where to dig deeper

The methodology page documents exactly which federal series we draw from, how we weight regional differences, and the reference period for each metric. The research section publishes original analyses derived from the same underlying database, useful when you want to see year-over-year shifts or peer-jurisdiction comparisons that the per-page detail views don't surface.

ThresholdFederal definitionPractical meaning
Below 7%AffordableComfortable margin for unexpected expenses
7-30%Moderate burdenManageable but constrains discretionary spending
Above 30%BurdenedHUD definition, qualifies for federal subsidy programs
Above 50%Severely burdenedTrade-offs with food, healthcare, savings
"The strongest decisions come from triangulating multiple data sources against your specific situation, not from chasing the latest headline number."

Frequently asked questions

Where does this data come from?

All figures on this page derive from official federal data, primarily the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and U.S. Department of Labor. We cite the underlying agency and series in the methodology section. No proprietary aggregators are used.

How often are figures updated?

Each series follows its own publication cadence. We refresh our database within 30 days of each upstream release. Specific update timestamps appear in the page footer where available; the methodology page documents the cadence per data series.

Can I use this data for my own analysis?

Yes. The underlying federal data is public domain. Our presentation, calculations, and editorial commentary are licensed for individual reference. For commercial republication or large-scale data extraction, contact us at the email listed on the contact page.

What if the figures here disagree with another source?

Different sources use different methodologies, definitions, geographic boundaries, and reference periods, disagreement is normal and informative. Our methodology page documents exactly which series and reference period we use for each metric, so you can reproduce or audit the figures against the upstream agency directly.