Hot Springs vs Texarkana

How to read this matchup

Reading the Hot Springs vs Texarkana Comparison

Hot Springs (AR) and Texarkana (TX) are assembled here from the same federal data pipeline, BEA Regional Price Parities, HUD Fair Market Rents, BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, FBI Uniform Crime Reports, NCES public-school counts, and EPA environmental indicators, so every number on this page is directly comparable. The overall cost index reads 85.7 for Hot Springs against 84.0 for Texarkana, a 1.7-point gap on a scale where 100 equals the U.S. average. HUD's 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent, the figure used to set housing-choice voucher payment standards, is $1,090/mo in Hot Springs and $880/mo in Texarkana, a $210/mo difference that compounds to $2,520 over a year.

On wages, BLS OES reports a median salary of $51,849 across 33,280 jobs in Hot Springs against $56,886 across 50,920 jobs in Texarkana. Adjusted through the BEA cost-of-living lens, $100,000 earned in Hot Springs carries the same local purchasing power as $97,996 in Texarkana - the most honest way to read the salary headline, because nominal wages and rents move together in tight metros. State-level violent crime, the most reliable geographic tier FBI UCR publishes, is 580.1 per 100,000 residents in AR vs 394.7 in TX, with property-crime rates of 1939.5 and 2058.2 respectively.

Schools are reported at the state tier by NCES: AR lists 1,069 public schools at a 13.6:1 student-teacher ratio, while TX lists 9,061 schools at 14.7:1, a signal of class-size staffing, though individual district and school-level variation within each state is substantial. When these pieces are read together rather than in isolation, Hot Springs and Texarkana are not simply "cheaper" or "more expensive" - they trade across dimensions, and which metro wins depends on whether your household optimizes for rent, wages, schools, childcare, safety, or environment. Treat the tables below as inputs to that trade-off, not as a single ranking.