2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Richmond, VA

Verify with HUD → · Verify with FBI → · Verify with EPA → · Verify with BEA → · Verify with BLS → · Verify with NCES → · Verify with Census →

Composite score across cost, rent, crime, wages, schools, childcare, and environment — sourced from seven federal agencies.

Ranked #157 of 387 metros · Top 59%

D
52.8
out of 100

Reading the Richmond Life Score

Richmond's composite score of 52.8 out of 100 — earning a grade of D — places the metro at rank #157 of 387 in the national file, inside the top 59%. The composite is a weighted roll-up of seven dimensions: Cost of Living (20%), Wages (20%), Rent (15%), Safety (15%), Schools (10%), Childcare (10%) and Environment (10%), each normalized to a 0-100 percentile scale. The strongest inputs are Wages (81/100) and Safety (80/100), which pull the composite upward, while Rent (23/100) and Schools (24/100) drag it downward. Because the weights are fixed, a metro that scores high on the 20%-weighted cost and wage dimensions can absorb mediocre scores elsewhere and still land a high composite — and vice versa.

Under the cost layer, BEA Regional Price Parities read 97.9 for Richmond — 2.1% below the U.S. average, with rent-specific RPP at 99.1. BLS wage records do not match this metro in the latest OES cycle. HUD's 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent for the metro comes in at $1,655/mo (studios $1,442/mo), the figure that governs housing-choice voucher payment standards and anchors the rent sub-score.

Safety is scored from FBI UCR at the state tier (VA), which reads 223 violent crimes per 100,000 residents and 1590 property crimes per 100,000 — state-level crime always overstates rural-county risk and understates urban-core risk inside a single metro, so the safety score should be read as a regional baseline, not a street-level reading. School quality rolls up from NCES at 14.0:1 statewide student-teacher ratio with 0.4% charter share — a structural signal, not a performance measure. Childcare uses DOL center-based infant cost of $10,407/yr, a line item that can shift a household's real cost-of-living picture more than headline RPP. Environment draws on EPA records including 35 Superfund sites tracked for VA. Compared against ranks #154 through #160 in the table below, Richmond's position is driven by the dimension weights above — not by any single metric — which is why the radar and sub-scores are worth more attention than the composite.

Score Breakdown

Cost of Living Wages Rent Safety Schools Childcare Environment

Dimension Scores

Cost of Living 30/100 (20%)
Wages 81/100 (20%)
Rent 23/100 (15%)
Safety 80/100 (15%)
Schools 24/100 (10%)
Childcare 54/100 (10%)
Environment 75/100 (10%)

Top Strengths

1
Wages
81/100
2
Safety
80/100
3
Environment
75/100

Areas for Improvement

1
Rent
23/100
2
Schools
24/100
3
Cost of Living
30/100

Key Data Points

97.9
Cost Index (RPP)
$1,655
2BR Fair Market Rent
223
Violent Crime/100K (VA)
14.0:1
Student-Teacher Ratio
$10,407
Infant Childcare/yr (VA)
35
Superfund Sites (VA)

Crime, schools, childcare, and environment data shown at state level where metro-specific data is unavailable.

Compare Richmond With...

Ranking Context

Richmond is in the top 59% of U.S. metros. Here's where it falls in the national rankings.

Rank Metro Score Grade
#154 Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX 52.9 D
#155 Eau Claire, WI 52.9 D
#156 Baton Rouge, LA 53.2 D
#157 Richmond, VA 52.8 D
#158 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 52.8 D
#159 Lubbock, TX 52.7 D
#160 York-Hanover, PA 52.7 D

Similar-Scoring Metros

VA Metro Scores

Explore Richmond Data

Planning a Move to Richmond? Get the Full Relocation Guide

This Life Score page compares Richmond on schools, crime, rent, demographics, and climate — useful when shortlisting metros side-by-side. Once Richmond is on your shortlist, the next layer of decision-making is cost of living, move-in checklist, climate exposure, and 7-dimension relocation intelligence (career, healthcare, lifestyle, infrastructure). PlainRelocate covers exactly that, with the same 387-metro coverage and matching slug — start with the Life Score here, then drill into relocation specifics there.

Get the full relocation guide for Richmond on PlainRelocate →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the life score for Richmond, VA?
Richmond, VA has a composite life score of 52.8 out of 100, earning a grade of D. It ranks #157 out of 387 U.S. metro areas. This score is based on 7 dimensions: cost of living, wages, rent affordability, safety, school quality, childcare costs, and environmental quality.
What are Richmond's biggest strengths?
Richmond's strongest dimensions are Wages (81/100), Safety (80/100), Environment (75/100). The wages score is particularly strong, placing the metro in the top tier nationally.
What are Richmond's weakest areas?
Richmond's lowest-scoring dimensions are Rent (23/100), Schools (24/100), Cost of Living (30/100). The rent score is notably below the median, which significantly impacts the overall composite rating.
How expensive is Richmond compared to the national average?
Richmond has a Regional Price Parity of 97.9, meaning it is 2.1% less expensive than the national average. Rents are indexed at 99.1.
How is the life score calculated?
The life score is a weighted composite of 7 dimensions: Cost of Living (20%), Wages (20%), Rent (15%), Safety (15%), Schools (10%), Childcare (10%), and Environment (10%). Each dimension is scored from 0 to 100 based on national percentile rankings using official U.S. government data from BEA, BLS, HUD, FBI, NCES, DOL, and EPA.

Research Guides

Data from BEA, HUD, FBI UCR, BLS OES, NCES, DOL, and EPA. Not affiliated with the U.S. Government.

Related

Data sourced from $official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCompare Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from BEA, BLS, HUD, FBI, NCES, DOL, and EPA. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page