2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Tucson, AZ

Verify with HUD → · Verify with FBI → · Verify with EPA → · Verify with BEA → · Verify with BLS → · Verify with NCES → · Verify with Census →

Composite score across cost, rent, crime, wages, schools, childcare, and environment — sourced from seven federal agencies.

Ranked #257 of 387 metros · Top 34%

D
46.0
out of 100

Reading the Tucson Life Score

Tucson's composite score of 46.0 out of 100 — earning a grade of D — places the metro at rank #257 of 387 in the national file, inside the top 34%. The composite is a weighted roll-up of seven dimensions: Cost of Living (20%), Wages (20%), Rent (15%), Safety (15%), Schools (10%), Childcare (10%) and Environment (10%), each normalized to a 0-100 percentile scale. The strongest inputs are Environment (91/100) and Schools (67/100), which pull the composite upward, while Safety (21/100) and Cost of Living (34/100) drag it downward. Because the weights are fixed, a metro that scores high on the 20%-weighted cost and wage dimensions can absorb mediocre scores elsewhere and still land a high composite — and vice versa.

Under the cost layer, BEA Regional Price Parities read 96.9 for Tucson — 3.1% below the U.S. average, with rent-specific RPP at 91.8. BLS wage records do not match this metro in the latest OES cycle. HUD's 2-bedroom Fair Market Rent for the metro comes in at $1,402/mo (studios $967/mo), the figure that governs housing-choice voucher payment standards and anchors the rent sub-score.

Safety is scored from FBI UCR at the state tier (AZ), which reads 429 violent crimes per 100,000 residents and 1786 property crimes per 100,000 — state-level crime always overstates rural-county risk and understates urban-core risk inside a single metro, so the safety score should be read as a regional baseline, not a street-level reading. School quality rolls up from NCES at 17.7:1 statewide student-teacher ratio with 25.9% charter share — a structural signal, not a performance measure. Childcare uses DOL center-based infant cost of $11,301/yr, a line item that can shift a household's real cost-of-living picture more than headline RPP. Environment draws on EPA records including 13 Superfund sites tracked for AZ. Compared against ranks #254 through #260 in the table below, Tucson's position is driven by the dimension weights above — not by any single metric — which is why the radar and sub-scores are worth more attention than the composite.

Score Breakdown

Cost of Living Wages Rent Safety Schools Childcare Environment

Dimension Scores

Cost of Living 34/100 (20%)
Wages 54/100 (20%)
Rent 38/100 (15%)
Safety 21/100 (15%)
Schools 67/100 (10%)
Childcare 38/100 (10%)
Environment 91/100 (10%)

Top Strengths

1
Environment
91/100
2
Schools
67/100
3
Wages
54/100

Areas for Improvement

1
Safety
21/100
2
Cost of Living
34/100
3
Childcare
38/100

Key Data Points

96.9
Cost Index (RPP)
$1,402
2BR Fair Market Rent
429
Violent Crime/100K (AZ)
17.7:1
Student-Teacher Ratio
$11,301
Infant Childcare/yr (AZ)
13
Superfund Sites (AZ)

Crime, schools, childcare, and environment data shown at state level where metro-specific data is unavailable.

Compare Tucson With...

Ranking Context

Tucson is in the top 34% of U.S. metros. Here's where it falls in the national rankings.

Rank Metro Score Grade
#254 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 46.1 D
#255 Salisbury, MD 46.1 D
#256 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 46.4 D
#257 Tucson, AZ 46.0 D
#258 Kenosha, WI 46.0 D
#259 Norwich-New London-Willimantic, CT 46.0 D
#260 Punta Gorda, FL 46.0 D

Similar-Scoring Metros

AZ Metro Scores

Explore Tucson Data

Planning a Move to Tucson? Get the Full Relocation Guide

This Life Score page compares Tucson on schools, crime, rent, demographics, and climate — useful when shortlisting metros side-by-side. Once Tucson is on your shortlist, the next layer of decision-making is cost of living, move-in checklist, climate exposure, and 7-dimension relocation intelligence (career, healthcare, lifestyle, infrastructure). PlainRelocate covers exactly that, with the same 387-metro coverage and matching slug — start with the Life Score here, then drill into relocation specifics there.

Get the full relocation guide for Tucson on PlainRelocate →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the life score for Tucson, AZ?
Tucson, AZ has a composite life score of 46.0 out of 100, earning a grade of D. It ranks #257 out of 387 U.S. metro areas. This score is based on 7 dimensions: cost of living, wages, rent affordability, safety, school quality, childcare costs, and environmental quality.
What are Tucson's biggest strengths?
Tucson's strongest dimensions are Environment (91/100), Schools (67/100), Wages (54/100). The environment score is particularly strong, placing the metro in the top tier nationally.
What are Tucson's weakest areas?
Tucson's lowest-scoring dimensions are Safety (21/100), Cost of Living (34/100), Childcare (38/100). The safety score is notably below the median, which significantly impacts the overall composite rating.
How expensive is Tucson compared to the national average?
Tucson has a Regional Price Parity of 96.9, meaning it is 3.1% less expensive than the national average. Rents are indexed at 91.8.
How is the life score calculated?
The life score is a weighted composite of 7 dimensions: Cost of Living (20%), Wages (20%), Rent (15%), Safety (15%), Schools (10%), Childcare (10%), and Environment (10%). Each dimension is scored from 0 to 100 based on national percentile rankings using official U.S. government data from BEA, BLS, HUD, FBI, NCES, DOL, and EPA.

Research Guides

Data from BEA, HUD, FBI UCR, BLS OES, NCES, DOL, and EPA. Not affiliated with the U.S. Government.

Related

Data sourced from $official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCompare Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from BEA, BLS, HUD, FBI, NCES, DOL, and EPA. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

All federal data sources used on this page